What could interrupt value?
Map cross-border exposure, selling friction, single-point reliance, transfer barriers and currency exposure. The interactive exercise below tests this question with assumptions you can change.
ASSET RESILIENCE INTELLIGENCE · MBA INNOVATION PROJECT
Markets move. Borders tighten. Liquidity disappears. IMOVEN brings geopolitical exposure, asset concentration and exit friction into one explainable decision view—starting with digital assets.
Most dashboards show what an asset is worth. Fewer show whether its owner can sell, transfer or protect it when a shock crosses borders.
The decision gap IMOVEN targetsGeopolitical events, restrictions, market liquidity and ownership details live in separate places.
Owners discover transfer constraints or thin buyer demand only when they urgently need cash.
Online businesses and digital holdings often lack a practical exit plan alongside other assets.
Why this matters: the IMF's 2025 Global Financial Stability Report describes how major geopolitical events can affect asset prices and financial stability. This is the motivation for scenario planning, not a claim that every shock can be predicted.
How exposed is the asset? How ready is its owner to exit? IMOVEN's proposed workflow connects those answers instead of treating risk and liquidity as separate reports.
Map cross-border exposure, selling friction, single-point reliance, transfer barriers and currency exposure. The interactive exercise below tests this question with assumptions you can change.
Check ownership records, viable buyers, transfer routes, sale time and fallback options. This review workflow is proposed for the pilot; the website does not calculate a readiness score today.
Record asset type, jurisdictions, sector, currency and dependencies.
Apply a disruption scenario; see which assumptions change.
Review evidence-backed warnings and an exit checklist.
Measure false alerts, outcomes and time saved to improve the model.
Choose an asset type, rate five vulnerabilities and apply a hypothetical event. The breakdown shows every adjustment before the result.
The asset type frames the example and suggested check. It does not add a hidden multiplier to the score.
Rate each vulnerability from 0 (low) to 100 (high). These are your assumptions, not imported portfolio or country data.
The result is a weighted average of the adjusted factors: cross-border 30%, selling 25%, single-point reliance 20%, transfer 15% and currency 10%. Event additions are preset, capped at 100 for each factor and shown above. The score is a discussion aid; the weights and events have not been validated as a forecast. The Country Explorer supplies separate context and does not automatically set these inputs.
The proposed innovation is an explainable workflow that connects geopolitical signals to asset-specific exit actions, with digital assets as the first niche.
Planned feeds include official sanctions notices, governance indicators and verified market data. Every alert would show its source, date and confidence.
A rule layer maps each event to a country, sector, counterparty or payment route. AI can summarize evidence and surface candidate links for human review.
Check transferable ownership, likely buyer channels, documents and fallback liquidity. Recommendations stay within a user's constraints.
BlackRock already offers a geopolitical risk dashboard; MSCI offers portfolio analytics. IMOVEN's proposed distinction is the combined cross-asset view, digital-asset starting point and explicit exit-readiness workflow for smaller owners. This difference must be tested with customers.
The interactive model calculates illustrative scores locally in your browser. It does not connect to accounts, monitor assets in real time, screen sanctions, execute trades or run a predictive AI model.
Start with digital businesses and digital financial holdings. Expand to selected securities and physical assets only after validating the data, restrictions checks and exit workflows.
A recurring portfolio monitoring subscription, plus an optional fixed-fee exit-readiness audit. Proposed pilot plans start at $19/month; see the full plan comparison. No claim of guaranteed return and no commission-driven ranking.
Compare proposed plans ↗Licensed data, validation, security, human review and customer support. Unit economics depend on retention exceeding acquisition and service costs.
Measure monthly active portfolios, paid renewals, data cost per client and support time. Fund new features from a positive contribution margin before expanding asset classes.
Log useful alerts, false alarms and missed events. Run quarterly customer reviews and compare the decision process against the customer's current method.
Keep reasons visible, protect private holdings and allow human challenge. Track compute and data retention; use lightweight rules before expensive AI. Do not claim environmental savings without measurement.
Ask digital-asset owners about decisions, past exit problems and existing tools. Record disconfirming evidence.
Manual weekly briefs with transparent scoring and exit checklists; compare with owners' current process.
Seek three paying users and two renewals. Track alert usefulness, time to decision and service cost; these are targets, not results.
Add assets and jurisdictions only after data quality, legal review and repeatable unit economics are demonstrated.
THE IMOVEN THESIS
Academic concept and browser-based prototype by Wael Seaf for MBHR 592. The model does not estimate investment returns, predict future crises or replace professional legal and financial review. The country explorer contains a dated 2025 World Bank data snapshot and a dated OFAC program-name mapping; it has no live data feed or transaction screening.